This biting piece from Brent Bozell of Townhall is worth reading. Jon Meacham, Newsweek’s editor, will be in Little Rock soon to speak at the Clinton School of Public Service as part of their ongoing Clinton Speakers Series.

Writes Mr. Bozell,

Newsweek’s strategy in the midst of all its financial decline is to double and triple the amount of editorializing, cast aside all semblance of “news” in favor of long, liberal essays by self-impressed Newsweek editor Jon Meacham and his international editor Fareed Zakaria. Is that really a business solution, or is it the captains performing violin solos on the deck of the Titanic?

Newsweek has seen a 52% decline in circulation since 2007.

UPDATE: I noticed that Jonathan Alter, Newsweek’s senior editor, will be speaking at the Clinton School on Tuesday, April 28th at noon.

Do you BlackBerry during meetings? When you’re sitting around doing nothing do you reach for it? Are you, for lack of a better term, addicted? If so, you may not want to read this Newsweek article on the effects the BlackBerry may be having on its 21 million users.

Writes Sharon Begley, “For whatever the virtues of a handheld, there is no question that, depending how you use it, you risk never focusing exclusively on any thought or perception for long and never being able to work straight through to completion on anything. That’s OK for tasks you can handle with half your cerebral lobes tied behind your back. It’s less fine when the task is, say, watching for track signals while operating a train.”

Regarding these types of people, she observes, “Given the damage caused by interruption overload and continuous partial attention, we can infer either of two things about people who use their BlackBerry while holding a conversation, weighing decisions, trying to solve a problem or attempting to do creative work with, they claim, no ill effects. Possibility one: they are lying. Possibility two: their work just isn’t that hard. Yes, you can schedule meetings. No, you cannot craft a smart stimulus bill.”

But it has a more recognize effect on decision making.  “Interruption overload can impair higher cognitive functions, too, starting with decision making. It takes time to bring your mind back to the task you left when the BlackBerry called, which means (if that task was listening to someone, for instance) you have missed more than occurred during just the seconds it took to read an e-mail. People take about 15 minutes to productively resume a challenging task when they are interrupted even by something as innocuous as an e-mail alert.”

Tagged with:
 

Mr. Obama and his Blackberry

There has been a substantial amount of interest placed on whether President-elect Barack Obama will carry his Blackberry with him when he’s president. Conventional wisdom suggests that he won’t.  First, there was this piece in The New York Times by Jeff Zeleny which raised myriad reasons why the president of the united states should be sans Blackberry, the most notable of which is that it allows people to bypass the bureaucracy and for Mr. Obama to do so as well. That might sound appealing, but the practical ramifications could be problematic.

Today, Michael Agger of Slate urges Mr. Obama to keep his Blackberry.  He opines, “You don’t need to be a computer lover to see that smooth information flow might be a help in tackling the complexity of the financial crisis, Iraq, Afghanistan, education, and health care. Tech policy starts at the top. Obama should set a precedent by having the ‘Berry at his side: Here is a government that is accessible, capable, and efficient.”

In Mr. Zeleny’s piece he noted, “Mr. Obama’s memorandums and briefing books were seldom printed out and delivered to his house or hotel room, aides said. They were simply sent to his BlackBerry for his review. If a document was too long, he would read and respond from his laptop computer, often putting his editing changes in red type.”

Jonathan Alter of Newsweek has also urged Mr. Obama to stay plugged in.  Alter’s argument is quite pragmatic.  “And the only way he can be successful in the presidency is if he can stay connected to the world beyond the “splendid isolation” of the presidency. To succeed, he must be constantly exposed to a wide variety of opinions—not just from advisers, experts, pundits and polls, but from his friends.”

The main argument for presidents giving up their e-mail is that it can he hacked.  Writing for Computerworld, Bill Brenner notes that there are several ways for the national security apparatus to protect from this.  Alter observes they have already agreed to do so on his oval office computer.

The Presidential Records Act requires that all White House correspondence become part of the public record.  Some are concerned that Mr. Obama’s e-mails would be included.  So what?  When Mr. Obama’s records are unsealed long after he leaves office, the public, historians and the press will have access to them. In turn, it will help everyone understand how technology helped the first president in history to use a laptop and a Blackberry do his job.  Isn’t that a good thing?

The future of the GOP

I’m taking in an early dose of MSNBC. One of the more interesting topics is the future of the GOP at the national level. Ed O’Keefe of The Washington Post and Eleanor Clift of Newsweek are tossing out a series of names that could emerge in the coming months. O’Keefe believes there a void in the Republican Party. Clift suggests that the party would look to Louisiana gov. Bobby Jindal. As for Sarah Palin? Both declared her the “champion of the culture wars.” But she needs to expand her role in the Republican Governors Association or run for the Senate to have a real shot in 2012.

Here in Arkansas we’re beginning to understand why things happened as they did. Despite Barack Obama’s electoral domination, Arkansas trended red by substantial margins. David Kinkade at The Arkansas Project informs us that Arkansas GOP chair Dennis Milligan will not seek re-election. Names rumored to succeed him? One politico writes to The Think Tank to suggest Little Rock businessman John Parke who ran unsuccessfully against David Johnson a few years back.

UPDATE: Norman Ornstein of The Los Angeles Times writes, “Republicans need to be more than just the only other option on the ballot in four years. They must find a message — be it a more refined compassionate conservativism, the folksy populism of Mike Huckabee or even a fiscally conservative/environmentally conservationist fusion — that speaks to the segments of the electorate that are growing. And then they need a leader to deliver it. At this early date after a dramatic election, there is no sign they have either.”

UPDATE II: Rich Lowry, writing in The Washington Post, observes, “As grim as things now seem for the right, there’s no reason to descend into the slough of despond. Just four years ago, Republicans were hailing the advent of a new Republican majority, remember? One of the wisest baseball cliches is: “You’re never as good as you seem when you’re winning and never as bad as you seem when you’re losing.”"