The venerable Daily Kos is calling on Sen. Blanche Lincoln to retire.

Democrats have a thick bench in Arkansas, and could make a serious bid to hold the seat. But Lincoln won’t pull it off. She’s toast.

If Lincoln cares about her state and her party, she’ll do the honorable thing like Chris Dodd and retire. Otherwise, let’s hope Lt. Gov. Bill Halter forcefully retires her in a primary.

I think Kos has this one wrong. First, consider the GOP candidates in this race. On a whole they’re incredibly weak. Taken individually, only state Sen. Gilbert Baker looks like a contender, and he may not get out of the GOP primary.

Second, consider the political history. Ms. Lincoln, hardly loved by the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party, is running in Arkansas, where voters overwhelmingly rejected Barack Obama in 2008. She’s won tough races before, including re-election to the House in 1994, and re-election to the Senate in 2004, when an anti gay marriage amendment was on the ballot. In that race she defeated Jim Holt, a staunch conservative from GOP dominated northwest Arkansas, who’s making another bid this go-round.

Third, her political standing is incomparable to Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd. She’s doesn’t have to answer for a Countrywide scandal or moving her entire family to another state. (Mr. Dodd moved his family to Iowa during the 2008 Democratic primary, going to so far as to enroll his kids in Iowa public schools.) Unlike Conn. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who has a 78% approval rating among Democrats and a 70% approval rating among Republicans, there isn’t an obvious alternative, although Lt. Gov. Bill Halter looks good on paper.

Finally, I think the polling in Arkansas is misleading. Voters are frustrated, but they don’t have any real sense of the alternative. Ms. Lincoln is the Agriculture Committee chairman, and her efforts on health care, why sloppy at the beginning, righted themselves at the end when it mattered. She’s against cap-and-trade and card check legislation, which puts her in line with many Arkansas voters. Once they are better educated about these matters my view is that her numbers will rise (Which is why I have called on the Lincoln campaign to spend some of her $6 million war chest – a health amount for a political race in Arkansas – on ads explaining her committee chairmanship, her vote on health care, and her plan for the economy).

I get the political sex appeal of Mr. Halter, particularly by progressives and by organized labor. And Mr. Halter may very well enter the Democratic primary and then we’ll know. But suggesting Ms. Lincoln is “unelectable” a gross exaggeration.

E.J. Dionne, writing in The Washington Post, assesses the political fall-out of yesterday’s announcements by Sens. Chris Dodd and Byron Dorgan to retire, along with Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter’s decision not to run for re-election.

He observes, as many did, that the situations in Connecticut and Colorado are actually quite good for Democrats. In North Dakota, where Mr. Dorgan was in lonely company as a Democrats, Republicans stand to gain if Gov. John Hoeven decides to run. (He’s hinted many times before about running, but has yet to step up.)

The 2010 Senate landscape is compounded by so many factors: presidential approval, economic circumstance, health care, and, now, terrorism. As I noted in a post yesterday, while the news of yesterday may have given the GOP a burst of energy (conservative Arkie blogger Jason Tolbert couldn’t shut-up about it on Twitter), the landscape still favors Democrats thanks to strong candidates and poor GOP approval nationally.

Mr. Dionne takes note of these races, including the contentious battle here in Arkansas involving Blanche Lincoln, and notes,

Democrats are betting that they will easily hold New York and California, while hanging on to Nevada — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has relatively unknown opponents and will have a huge bank account — and Pennsylvania. Arkansas Sen. Blanche Lincoln confronts the most difficult terrain of any Democrat this year, but she may profit from Republican divisions.

Then there are the Democrats’ wild cards: five Republican seats where some combination of strong Democratic candidates, divisive Republican primaries or potentially weak GOP nominees offers a chance to offset losses.

In rough descending order of possibility, these include Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, North Carolina and Kentucky. Democrats can’t bank on any of them, but just a win or two would buy their majority protection.

First Byron Dorgan and now Chris Dodd. The former is arguably more shocking than the latter. After all, Mr. Dodd had the worst polling numbers of any Democratic incumbent in the Senate and he was almost certain to lose in November. Mr. Dorgan, on the other hand, was a well-liked Democrat in the red state of North Dakota, although he might have faced a considerable battle in November.

Republicans will be quick to say this signals peril inside the Democratic Party. Maybe so. Although remember that six (6) Senate Republicans announced their retirement this cycle.

In Mr. Dodd’s case, his withdrawal paves the way for a much more popular Democrat, Attorney Gen. Richard Blumenthal, to run. He’s the states most popular politician making it unlikely this seat will flip to the Republicans.

Mr. Dorgan’s case isn’t as sunny for the Democratic Party. Their best option appears to be Rep. Earl Pomeroy, the state’s lone representative in the House. He’s likely to square off with Gov. John Hoeven, a Republican, who won re-election in 2008 with 74% of the vote, making this a likely Republican pick-up.

For those of you interested in the pivotal 2010 U.S. Senate races, Arkansas (D), Delaware (D), Pennsylvania (D), Nevada (D), North Dakota (D) Connecticut (D) and Colorado (D) are the most likely pick-off states for Republicans.

On the other side, Missouri (R), Ohio (R), Kentucky (R), North Carolina (R) and New Hampshire (R) are the most likely pick-off states for the Democrats.

Here’s a quick look at what’s happening in those races:

Arkansas: I’ve made my thoughts on Sen. Blanche Lincoln well-known. She finished Q4 of 2009 very strong, and her likely GOP opponent, Gilbert Baker, hasn’t offered anything beyond the Just Say No positions of national Republicans (who remain very unpopular).

Delaware: If Beau Biden, the state’s Attorney General and son of Vice President Joe Biden, gets in this race it stands a fighting chance of staying with the Democrats. The GOP candidate, Rep. Mike Castle, 70, is considered the GOP’s best hope in a state that has voted for Democrats in the past five races for governor, president and Senate.

Pennsylvania: Republican Pat Toomey is cut from the same ideological cloth as former Sen. Rick Santorum, whom Pennsylvanians voted out of office. He leads Sen. Arlen Specter by single digits. Interestingly, polls show Mr. Specter with support of only 73% of Democrats.

Nevada: It’s a Democratic Party machine state, and Sen. Harry Reid (D) has been elected to the Senate four times.

Colorado: This one remains peculiar, particularly because Gov. Bill Ritter, a Democrat, announced that he would not seek re-election. He came under fire for appointing Michael Bennett rather than former House speaker Andrew Romanoff. A December poll from Rasmussen shows former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton (R) leading both candidates by single digits.

Missouri: Robin Carnahan (D) maintains a narrow lead over Rep. Roy Blunt (R).

Ohio: Both Democratic candidates are within the margin of error against Rep. Rob Portman (R).

(A key factor in both Missouri and Ohio will be the approval rating of the GOP in Congress. A Gallup poll conducted Dec, 11-13, 2009 shows it approval of Congress by Republicans currently at 15%. This Quinnipiac poll shows that 29% of voters approve of the way Republicans in Congress are handling their job. Sorry, that wasn’t clear before. Thumbs Up: P.O.)

North Carolina: GOP incumbent Richard Burr has an approval rating of 37% and leads a generic Democrat by a slim margin of 42% – 41%.

New Hampshire: Both candidates, former AG Kelly Ayotte (R) and Rep. Paul Hodes (D) are unknown. Ms. Ayotte, despite holding statewide office for five years, is known by only 22% of the voters. Mr. Hodes is known by 16% of voters.

Kentucky: The GOP is set to nominate Rand Paul, son of former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul. That will mean big bucks, but not good general election prospects. A Survey USA poll shows Mr. Paul losing to Dem. Jack Conway, the state’s AG, and tied with Dan Mongiardo, the state’s Lt. Governor.

We’re still ten months from election day, so take these polls for what they’re worth.

Happy New Year, and Welcome Back

After a lengthy stay in Memphis, Tennessee for a New Year’s/Liberty Bowl/ Beale Street vacation, The Think Tank is back at work and admiring the light snow that is falling in downtown Little Rock.

I’m catching up on local news. I’m sad to hear that Henry Woods, a former aide to Sen. Dale Bumpers, passed away. He was 58.

My Top 10 movies of the year appeared in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette New Year’s Day. If you don’t have a subscription, here they are: 1) The Hurt Locker, 2) Where the Wild Things Are, 3) An Education, 4) Summer Hours, 5) Bright Star, 6) Adventureland, 7) Precious, 8) Fantastic Mr. Fox, 9) Public Enemies, 10) Inglorious Basterds. Since I submitted this list I saw Up in the Air (terrific), Nine (A dazzling mess), Sherlock Holmes (entertaining with too much CGI), Avatar (gorgeous and hyper-political) and It’s Complicated (a very funny Alec Baldwin).

Last week I released my 2009 year in review in politics and blogging.

Jason Tolbert notes that Sarah Palin may or may not be coming to Arkansas next month.

Lance Turner is finally back blogging.

It sounds like John Brummett wants George W. Bush back in the Oval Office. He elaborates on his blog.

House Speaker Robbie Wills blogs his new year’s resolutions, one of which is “not to annoy John Brummett.” Come on Mr. Speaker, your new year’s resolution should be something more firm: “I endeavor that my blog, robbiewills.com, will never suck as bad as John Brummett’s.”

Pat Lynch says good riddance to 2009.

2009 was an interesting year in Arkansas and beyond. There was good news, bad news and all-together odd news about people, places, companies and industry. Below are my reflections (with a lot more after the jump).

Best National Political Moment
Barack Obama taking the oath of office in front of more than 2 million on the National Mall and millions more around the world. Police noted that there was not a single incident of disturbance on the mall that day.

Best Arkansas Political Moment
Lt. Gov. Bill Halter, much to the ire of his political adversaries, fulfilled his campaign promise to deliver an Arkansas lottery. After a rocky beginning, the lottery took off and millions of dollars will go towards college scholarships for Arkansas students.

Most Unassuming Political Moment That Will Have Lasting Benefit
Gov. Mike Beebe’s ability to trim the state’s budget without cutting jobs of state employees. Arkansas received high marks for its economic standing, including a lower unemployment rate than the rest of the country.

Best Political News Get By a Non-News Guy
Jason Tolbert of The Tolbert Report broke the news that Arkansas state Sen. Kim Hendren referred to New York Senator Charles Schumer as “that Jew” in a speech. The story went national instantly.

Most Notable Arkansas Political Figure
Gov. Mike Beebe for his sky high approval ratings and mastery of the legislative and budget process.

Most Notorious Arkansas Political Figure
State Sen. Kim Hendren. See above.

Most Notorious Arkansas Political Figure Runners-Up
State Rep. Beverly Pyle, guns in church enthusiast.
Arkansas GOP Chairman Doyle Webb for his offensive and discriminatory comments about State Rep. Kathy Webb.

Best Arkansas Blogging Take-Down
David Kinkade
of The Arkansas Project for his “Ten People Who Should Never Blog” post. It was also the best Arkansas blog post of 2009.

Howard Beale “I’m Mad As Hell” Moment to Which No One Paid Attention
John Brummett bitching at me and David Kinkade on a variety of matters, including the declining newspaper industry.

(more…)

The health insurance reform bill continues to plow through the U.S. Senate. Republicans agreed to hold the final vote on the measure tomorrow morning at 8:00 a.m. The bill is expected to pass comfortably, and then the Senate and the House will begin negotiations on a final bill that will then face one more vote in both houses before heading to President Barack Obama’s desk.

Politico notes today that it’s probably going to take all of January and the first part of February to hash out the final details of the bill. That said, House leaders are inclined to accept the compromise bill approved by the Senate.

In Arkansas, MIT health economist Dr. Jonathan Gruber projected that Arkansas families would save money under the Senate version of the bill. According to his findings,

  • Without reform, an Arkansas family of four with an annual income of $32,406 would be at risk of spending $23,600 in annual health care costs – or 73 percent of their income – in 2016.
  • Under the Senate’s revised health reform plan, in 2016 that same family’s health care spending threshold would be $5,740 – 18 percent of their income.  That’s a potential savings of $17,860 – income that could be used for other necessities, a child’s college fund, or retirement savings.
  • Under the Senate’s plan, an Arkansas family of four with an annual income of $96,491 could potentially save $3,938 in 2016.

Jason Tolbert Departs HuckPAC

Right-of-center blogaholic Jason Tolbert resigned his post as Arkansas coordinator for Mike Huckabee’s political action committee today. Mr. Tolbert gives us a little insight into his rationale on his blog, “The Tolbert Report,” and notes that the events surrounding Maurice Clemmons played a role.

It’s got to be a tough day for him, Mr. Tolbert, I mean. He probably has the same feeling I did when I realized that professional wrestling was fake.

“The Tolbert Report” is terrific, particularly for those of you interested in what’s happening with the state GOP. It’s also gotten funnier as of late. (See his post on the Drew PrittKim Hendren debate yesterday at UALR.)

Mr. Huckabee is scheduled to speak at the Clinton School of Public Service on December 14th, for what it’s worth.

On Blanche Lincoln and 2010

I had a nice chat with Matthew Bigg of Reuters last week about the 2010 Senate race in Arkansas. His comprehensive analysis used a bit of what I had to say.

Speaking of the 2010 Senate race, I sat down with David Sanders of Stephens Media on his monthly public affairs program, “Unconventional Wisdom,” where we discussed the race among many other political topics in Arkansas. You can watch the episode here.

Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight.com asks the question in light of Arkansas Rep. Mike Ross’s stated opposition to a public option as part of health care reform. Writes Mr. Silver,

Ross may well have gotten a significant number of letters and e-mails against the public option. He may have hosted a town hall forum before an audience who was skeptical of such a provision. But if Ross had actually polled his district, it’s unlikely he would have found overwhelming opposition to the public option. Instead, he might even have found a that a plurality or majority of his constituents supported the public plan.

He further argues that there is a direct correlation between support for the public option and poverty.

While Arkansas-4 does not have a lot of Obama voters, it does have a lot of people in poverty: 20.5 percent of its population, which ranks it 50th out of the 435 Congressional Districts. It is basically like an exaggerated version of Kentucky where, according to the Research 2000 poll, 46 percent support the public option and 45 percent oppose it. That the public option is “overwhelmingly” unpopular in such a district is unlikely.

Using logistic regression, Mr. Silver and his team have forecasted where support for a public option lies, and the data is broken down by congressional district.

Here are the numbers for Arkansas,

AR – 1 48% (Favor), 42% (Unfavor)
AR – 2 45% (Favor), 44% (Unfavor)
AR – 3 34% (Favor), 54% (Unfavor)
AR – 4 49% (Favor), 41% (Unfavor)

UPDATE: A few of the posts in the comments section note, Daily Kos via Research 2000, a non-partisan polling group, is going to look into polling the 4th district and other blue dog districts to determine whether Mr. Silver’s numbers are accurate. Like I said below, Mr. Silver’s built his reputation on his statistical analysis and extrapolation, so I think it’s worth taking serious stock in his numbers.

One of my most popular posts last week was one titled Citizenry of Sillytown, USA in which I questioned the efforts by so many Americans – particularly the Republican Party – to stir up controversy around President Barack Obama’s speech. Appearing on The Dave Elswick Show last week with David Kinkade of The Arkansas Project, guest-host Alice Stewart asked me about my characterization of protesters at health care town halls as “shouters.” This, too, has been good for Web traffic.

Bob Herbert’s column today in The New York Times got me thinking about all of this in light of two important speeches Mr. Obama will deliver this week: one on education today in Virginia, and an address to a joint session of Congress on health care reform.

Mr. Herbert notes,

There is no end to the craziness. The entire Republican Party has decided that it is in favor of absolutely nothing. The president’s stimulus package? No way. Health care reform? Forget about it.

There is not a thing you can come up with that the G.O.P. is for. Sunshine in the morning? Harry Reid couldn’t persuade a single Senate Republican to vote yes.

Incredibly, the party’s poll numbers are going up.

According to the daily presidential tracking poll by Rasmussen Reports, 50% of Americans approve of Mr. Obama’s performance, 49% disapprove. So what gives? Since when did being against everything inspire faith in a political party?

Take, for example, the cash-for-clunkers program. Creative and wildly successful, former Republican presidential contender Mike Huckabee didn’t think so, arguing that the sales would have occurred anyway. There’s no evidence of this, of course. Still, it personifies the deterioration of political discourse in America. Put another way: if Mr. Obama is for it, the GOP is against it.

The visciousness by which this strategy is employed is best evidenced by the opposition to his address to school children today. Silly in every aspect, it also exposed deep-seeded ignorances and biases among on citizens. Spend a few minutes on Michelle Malkin’s blog and understand what I’m talking about.

Yet, Mr. Obama appears to be in a free fall. Watching MSNBC over the Labor Day weekend Charlie Cook of The Cook Political Report questioned whether moderate Democrats would even attend Mr. Obama’s speech on Wednesday night. First, we keep the President out of schools and now members of his own party avoid perhaps the most important speech of his political life?

To quote NealGladner via Twitter: “I wish people still respected the office of the President, even if they disagree with him. No excuse for the venom about his talk to kids.”

Unfortunately, we appear headed in the opposite direction.

It’s School Speech Day

After much ado about nothing, President Barack Obama will deliver an address to school children all across the country today. As expected the text of the speech was released early, and brought with it plenty of compliments from its critics, including Florida Republican Party Chairman Jim Greer who said, “In its current form, it’s fine.”

Previously I noted that the Cabot school district will not be showing the speech. Episcopal Collegiate in Little Rock won’t be showing it either. And there’s mass confusion in Fayetteville over whether it will be shown. The district isn’t prohiting the showing of the speech. Hard to tell if they’re encouraging it.

Safe Foods CEO and blogger Curtis Coleman made it official yesterday: he’s running as a Republican for US Senate in 2010. He’s the first to formally announce his candidacy; Tom Cox (of the Arkansas TEA movement), state Sen. Kim Hendren and Tom Cotton are all rumored to be swirling the race. State Sen. Gilbert Baker may throw his hat into the ring, too.

Blogger Coleman has strong connections to former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee. Will Mr. Huckabee dive into the Republican primary and endorse? Blogger Coleman has to hope so, especially if Mr. Hendren’s in the race. Depsite prior nasty comments, he’ll bring a substantial contingency of northwest Arkansas Republicans with him. And if Gilbert Baker gets in, well, it’s going to be tough to rip central Arkansas support from him. After all, unlike blogger Coleman, Mr. Gilbert could act the part of true contender.

David Kinkade of The Arkansas Project has always been a fan of Mr. Cotton, Harvard and Harvard Law educated, and a member of the U.S. Army who just returned from duty in Afghanistan. David Sanders of Stephens Media Group is, too.

Cotton sounds like a dream come true for a state party reeling from a lack of proven talent that is also heading into the first election cycle in years in which the GOP may actually have a few advantages over Democrats.

Great biography, surely, but this would be his first rodeo. Anyway, time’s running out for these guys to make a decision. Sen. Blanche Lincoln has millions of dollars in the bank.

It’s with some sadness that The Think Tank bids farewell to Zack “It’s with a K” Stovall, a.k.a Nick, who wrote for Stephens Media and ran an entertaining and wordy blog that often lampooned me and my arch nemesis, John Brummett. Mr. Stovall’s heading north, to St. Louis, where a young lady that he likes lives, and where he claims that he’ll be working in politics and journalism. I just hope he attends at Cardinals game or two.

Anyway, Arkansas loses a blogging personality and national media face (He was on The Rachel Maddow Show, you know) today. And The Lonely Misfits Drinking Society loses a member and friend.

Enjoy the ride, Nick. I’ll see you on the Internet.

Thank you to the readers of the Arkansas Times for recognizing this blog, Blake’s Think Tank, as a runner-up for best local blog. The Arkansas Times own blog, the Arkansas Blog, took top honors. Kudos to Little Rock Paper Scissors for being recognized as well.

Keeping an Eye on November 2010

My nemesis, David Kinkade of The Arkansas Project, whom yesterday disparaged my reputation by calling me two dreadful P words on his smart-ass blog, has compiled a helpful list of candidates running for the Arkansas House of Representatives in 2010. Mr. Kinkade promises a similar list for the Arkansas Senate, constitutional offices, as well as U.S. House and U.S. Senate (Raise the roof, Blogger Coleman) in the next few days.

Thanks to super blogger Jason Tolbert for keeping up with all of the Republicans wanting to run for the U.S. Senate. His blog points me to news that Trevor Drown, hunter of Taliban and Al-Qaeda, has announced that he’s running for U.S. Senate as an Independent. I’m not sure why; maybe it was all of Curtis Coleman’s bloggin’ or Conrad E. Reynolds imposing middle initial (emphasis added). Surely it wasn’t that soothsayer Kim Hendren. Oh well, Mr. Drown is in, which should make for lots of blogging fun assuming he gets on the ballot.

Don’t forget to take a look at his Web site. He has three Mr. Rogers-like videos on his site where he’s standing behind a pick-up truck attaching stickers to bottles of water and mumbling about a variety of things, looking occasionally at the camera to drive home a point. The first video is incoherent, but the second two attack the Arkansas lottery and more specifically the lottery executive director, whom he declares “the lottery winner”. Not really sure what he’s going for here from a campaign issue perspective, particularly when he says, as for those of you that are responsible for this (namely, the compensation) “we’ll deal with you come 2010.” He sounds real serious when he says it though, which isn’t like Mr. Rogers at all. And he ditched the cardigan sweater for some cargo pants.

Someone should remind Mr. Drown, though, that the lottery is a state issue and that even if he makes it all the way to Washington (which is kind of like saying that I’m going to make it all to way to the moon with a couple of bottle rockets and a picture of Sally Ride) the U.S. Senate still won’t have jurisdiction over the Arkansas lottery.

Political party rallies, like the one that took place on Friday evening at Verizon Arena when the Democratic Party of Arkansas amidst record heat held a marathon Jefferson Jackson Day dinner featuring everyone, including high octane Democratic operative Paul Begala. The Think Thank was there tweeting.

The coverage in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette the following day which featured a picture of the wife of the late Bill Gwatney, the former state party chairman and state senator who was murdered in his office at DPA headquarters, on the front page of the Arkansas section along with other things has stirred the partisan emotions of David Kinkade at The Arkansas Project.

He writes,

I don’t much go in for “liberal media bias” bellyaching from conservatives, because it’s boring and unconstructive, like whining about the weather. But if you are an Arkansas Republican candidate for office in 2010, I’d keep in mind that the state’s largest daily newspaper and its chief political reporter have done you a tremendous favor by laying down their standard, at an early point in the process, for how you and your Democratic opposition will be treated in the coming campaign season. Rest assured, you will not receive the same type of coverage. Plan accordingly.

Mr. Kinkade has twice written on the op-ed pages of the Democrat Gazette in recent months. The first was about the role of bloggers in today’s media climate (an exception piece and you should read it). The second was about the value and impact of the TEA parties. Thorough and helpful for those of us who think TEA parties are a much like county fairs, I don’t recall the Dem-Gaz offering a counterpoint on the issue. In fact, the last time I checked the editorial board held Republicans in pretty high regard over there.

UPDATE: Check out the comments section for from Mr. Kinkade and me. And Mr. Tolbert’s covering this like it’s a Sarah Palin event. Read his blog for lots of long quotes from both of us.

Talking Points Memo has created a series of Twitter rooms for political junkies. You can follow Elected Dems on Capitol Hill, Elected Republicans on Capitol Hill, Democratic and Liberal Insiders, Republican and Conservative Insiders, and Reporters and Bloggers. These “rooms” aggregate feeds so that you can view them easily and they refresh automatically. It’s a great feature.

The New York Times Magazine cover story this week is a profile of Valerie Jarrett, a longtime friend and ally of Barack Obama’s who now works alongside him in The White House. Her role, classified a senior adviser and assistant to the president for intergovernmental affairs and public engagement, is better stated as “Obama’s intermediary to the outside world.”

Among the narrative threads that course almost uninterrupted throughout the history of the American presidency is the inevitable presence in the White House of The One Who Gets the Boss. Karen Hughes got George W. Bush. Bruce Lindsey got Bill Clinton. Jim Baker got the elder Bush. And so on, back to William Seward’s evolving closeness with Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson’s lifelong reliance on the counsel of James Madison. Each such aide has served his or her president in a way that reveals the latter’s psychology.

Talk Business Quarterly released the results of a second round of polling. In this edition, TBQ asked 600 Arkansans which outlet (TV, print, radio, Internet) do they rely the most heavily on for news. The numbers may surprise you.

Cable TV News Channels  31%
TV News  22%
Internet Web Sites  11%
Local Newspapers  10%
Radio News  3%
Talk Radio  3%
Magazines  1%
Other  5%
None/Unsure 2%
Combination/All  12%

This should stir some conversation today.