SXSW – - UPDATE

For those of that are fans of SXSW I’m hoping you’ll follow my work colleague, Emily Reeves, as she hangs out with all of the interesting folks in Austin. She’ll be blogging and on Twitter. Michel Gondry, Quentin Tarantino, Elvis Mitchell and a stellar interactive line-up. This is one festival that won’t suck.

UPDATE: Ms. Reeves talks to KTHV Channel 11 via Skype about what’s happening at the festival.

 

The world is all a buzz about Apple’s announcement of the iPad, a mobile device that is part iPhone, part iMac. The hype was almost too much to bear; people rolled out with phone mock-ups, outlandish theories and imaginations. Nevertheless, the device is here. It seems pretty cool, as is everything that Apple creates these days. My wife has an iMac and an iPhone. I have a PC and a Blackberry. Maybe we’ll buy an iPad. I don’t know.

The announcement comes on the same day that President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address. It’s an important speech. No, it’s bigger than that. His presidency will hinge on his ability to generate renewed trust, and the only way to do that is to begin a new conversation and keep that conversation going.

If the past year has shown us anything it’s that unlike technology politics doesn’t foster innovation. If it did, we’d have seen more creative and effective responses to exploding health care costs and the need for more jobs, for example. (Don’t go pointing fingers and laughing, Republicans, the egg’s on your face, too.)

However, technology has improved much of what we do today. Our life is easier thanks to our laptops, mobile devices and endless zones of WiFi. On a flight from Dallas to Salt Lake City I conducted business efficiently for $9.95 thanks to the gogo network.

Earlier on Twitter I wrote sardonically that Mr. Obama’s communications team bumped the State of the Union to avoid being trumped by Lost or American Idol (or some other Fox ratings giant) only to be smothered by Steve Jobs and the iPad announcement.

Conventional wisdom says that no one is interested in Mr. Obama’s speech. After all, why care about the state of our nation when there’s a cool new gadget is on the market, right? Or when you can read the copy online?

William Saletan, writing for Slate, raised the question: which is more important, politics or technology. He then determined, “technology, as a driver of social change, is overtaking politics.”

I wonder whether the comparison of the two is even reasonable. After all, social change in inherently political. The engine in many circumstances, particularly in the past twelve months, has been technological.

Which makes Mr. Jobs’ speech today and Mr. Obama’s speech this evening equally important. (You can add to this a review of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s speech last Thursday on Internet freedom.)

(more…)

 

Broadband as a Legal Right

Internet access in Finland is now a legal right. According to CNN:

Starting in July, telecommunication companies in the northern European nation will be required to provide all 5.2 million citizens with Internet connection that runs at speeds of at least 1 megabit per second.

 

If you check out Arkansas Business this week you’ll see an article on smart phone etiquette. You can ignore the photo, but I’m quoted in the piece offering two different perspectives regarding this topic. Our president, Millie Ward of Stone Ward, is also quoted in the piece discussing how smart phones can be helpful to gauge audience feedback in real time.

Mark Pfeifle, writing for the Christian Science Monitor, pens an op-ed in which he advocates the Nobel Peace Prize for Twitter and its creators. Mr. Pfeifle’s no slouch. From 2007 to 2009 he was the deputy national security adviser for strategic communications and global outreach.

In his piece he argues,

Neda became the voice of a movement; Twitter became the megaphone. Twitter is a free social-messaging utility. It drove people around the world to pictures, videos, sound bites, and blogs in a true reality show of life, dreams, and death. Last month’s marches for freedom and the violent crackdowns were not only documented but personalized into a story of mythic tragedy.

When traditional journalists were forced to leave the country, Twitter became a window for the world to view hope, heroism, and horror. It became the assignment desk, the reporter, and the producer. And, because of this, Twitter and its creators are worthy of being considered for the Nobel Peace Prize.

K. Ryan James elaborates on his own blog,

Without Twitter and other social media, the world would have never known anything more that one candidate accusing another cadidate of election shenanigans. Without Twitter, we would have likely never had the opportunity to know about this YouTube video. Because of this, I agree with Mr. Pfeifle – Twitter is deserving of consideration.

When I was at Personal Democracy Forum 2009 last week in New York I sat in on a panel discussing the impact that social media had in Iran. The impact is real, although Frank Rich of The New York Times, also appearing at PDF, was a bit annoyed at the obsession with social media. There are some 80,000 bloggers in Iran and social media – from blogs to Facebook to Flickr – are influential tools in reaching the elite sectors of Iranian society. It also allowed for participation. People could do everything from identify proxy servers to change their profile pictures.

Previously, fellow blogger, Ms. Adverthinker, and I discussed the role that social media was playing in the immediate aftermath of the elections in Iran.

Tagged with:
 

I just wrapped up day two of Personal Democracy Forum 2009. You can check out my Twitter feed for a play-by-play about what happened throughout the day.

I participated in a discussion about the role of online community hubs and the impact they have on state and local politics with The Uptake and E-Democracy. Check out these organizations and what they’re up to. Very cool stuff.

Hopefully I will have video of the panel by the time I return. Until then . . .

Tagged with:
 

As many of you are aware I’m attending and speaking at Personal Democracy Forum 2009, the largest conference on technology and politics in the U.S. We just wrapped up day one which included a lot of compelling information from Joe Rospars (Obama ‘08), Mark McKinnon (McCain ‘08), Jeff Jarvis, author of “What Would Google Do?” and David Weinberger of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard. I also sat in on two panels: one on social media and Iran (I urge you to take a look at this discussion from me and @reeves501 on the topic) and the future of community journalism. You can get a play-by-play by reading my Twitter feed.

Naturally, I was really looking forward to listening to Mr. Rospars talk about new media and the Obama campaign. I pulled several of his points into my Twitter feed, and what struck me the most was the clarity with which the Obama campaign understood and embraced the value of new media. From the very beginning they all realized (and by “all” Mr. Rospars indicated Mr. Obama and campaign manager David Plouffe) that new media wasn’t a replacement for anything and that it had to be tied to traditional camapign efforts. Essentially, Mr. Rospars advocated ways that new media could help bolster the work of the traditional side of politics. This was clearly a lesson learned from Howard Dean’s ill-fated 2004 presidential bid. As I like to say many times regarding online communications: the idea is to take good ideas and make them better.

New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg couldn’t attend at the last minute so he participated live via Skype and talked about a new initiative in New York called 311 which is intended to encourage civic participation. The program has a Web site, Twitter account, Skype account, phone hotline and e-mail address. Citizens are encouraged to report everything from trash that needs to be picked up to the state of city parks and schools to crime and more. What a great endeavor for a city of 8 million. I’d certainly like to see something like this in Little Rock.

(more…)

It was only a matter of time . . . Word is spreading across the Internet today that the Scott Rudin – Aaron Sorkin project, “The Social Network,” about the founding of Facebook, is getting closer to reality. New York Magazine is reporting that David Fincher, who’s done some genius work (“Fight Club,” “Zodiac”), but who recently brought us the unwatchable film, “The Curious Case of Benjamin Brummett Button,” is in line to direct.

It’s based on the book, “The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook, A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius and Betrayal” by Ben Mezrich, which will be released on July 14.

Tagged with:
 

Carlos Watson of MSNBC and TheStimulist.com profiles New York Times columnist Frank Rich in the context of his growing influence on the American political process.

Mr. Watson writes,

Rich doesn’t just challenge conventional assumptions, he’s able to deconstruct the political charades that often have draped over health care reform, the mess in Iraq, the intense Democratic presidential primary or even the stimulus package. He’s not as reliant on conventional punditry, and therefore his punditry doesn’t feel conventional. While his colleagues on the Times‘ op-ed page have also enjoyed a surge in popularity and relevance just as the newspaper itself is struggling, none has redirected the political conversation as regularly as Rich.

It’s hard to disagree. Mr. Rich has become a consistent voice on politics and public affairs, and rarely does a Sunday pass when his column fails to stir conversation on this blog and elsewhere.

I’m pleased that he’ll be at Personal Democracy Forum 2009 next week. His topic is “How the Internet Ecosystem Can Improve Journalism” and he’ll be joined by Karen Tumulty of TIME, Dan Gillmor of the Center for Citizen Media, Scott Simon of NPR and Clay Shirkey of NYU.

The second of what will likely be infinite Little Rock Tweet-Ups happens tonight at the Capital Hotel Bar and Grill. Lance Turner, chief executive officer of Citizens for a Twitter Society, notes on his blog that there will be some nice drink specials and free apps (appetizers not applications, you geek).

The Think Tank plans to drop by. Hope you’ll do the same. 5:30 p.m.

Add this to the list of very interesting commencement speeches. (Thumbs Up: @rachaeldean)

SWIM Today at 5:00 p.m.

Session #3 of SWIM kicks off today at 5:00 p.m. at Community Bakery in downtown Little Rock. We’ll be streaming live on the SWIM site so please check in.  The topic today is “Give Me Quality Content (For Free?): Information Exchange in a Blogospheric Age.” This week we’ll have some research on the Arkansas blogosphere and how Arkansas bloggers are using their blogs and their time.

Please join us online or in person. If you happen to miss it we’ll archive everything on the site and you can watch it at your convenience.

Also, if you missed our session on social media and American Idol from yesterday it’s posted on the site.

Okay, @ghidotti has made Lance Turner’s year. Or maybe @LT has made Natalie Ghidotti’s year. Either way, someone’s organized a Tweetup in Little Rock. Yes, all Twitter enthusiasts in central Arkansas are invited to Sticky Fingerz in the River Market at 5:30 p.m. to do what exactly I don’t know. But The Think Tank will be there.

More from Mr. Turner of Lance Turner’s Blog and David Kinkade of The Arkansas Project.

UPDATE: Lance Turner has pictures, updates and more on his blog. Below, me, David Kinkade of The Arkansas Project (@davidkinkade) and John Anderson of the ARCCA blog (@ARCCAblog).