The world is all a buzz about Apple’s announcement of the iPad, a mobile device that is part iPhone, part iMac. The hype was almost too much to bear; people rolled out with phone mock-ups, outlandish theories and imaginations. Nevertheless, the device is here. It seems pretty cool, as is everything that Apple creates these days. My wife has an iMac and an iPhone. I have a PC and a Blackberry. Maybe we’ll buy an iPad. I don’t know.
The announcement comes on the same day that President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address. It’s an important speech. No, it’s bigger than that. His presidency will hinge on his ability to generate renewed trust, and the only way to do that is to begin a new conversation and keep that conversation going.
If the past year has shown us anything it’s that unlike technology politics doesn’t foster innovation. If it did, we’d have seen more creative and effective responses to exploding health care costs and the need for more jobs, for example. (Don’t go pointing fingers and laughing, Republicans, the egg’s on your face, too.)
However, technology has improved much of what we do today. Our life is easier thanks to our laptops, mobile devices and endless zones of WiFi. On a flight from Dallas to Salt Lake City I conducted business efficiently for $9.95 thanks to the gogo network.
Earlier on Twitter I wrote sardonically that Mr. Obama’s communications team bumped the State of the Union to avoid being trumped by Lost or American Idol (or some other Fox ratings giant) only to be smothered by Steve Jobs and the iPad announcement.
Conventional wisdom says that no one is interested in Mr. Obama’s speech. After all, why care about the state of our nation when there’s a cool new gadget is on the market, right? Or when you can read the copy online?
William Saletan, writing for Slate, raised the question: which is more important, politics or technology. He then determined, “technology, as a driver of social change, is overtaking politics.”
I wonder whether the comparison of the two is even reasonable. After all, social change in inherently political. The engine in many circumstances, particularly in the past twelve months, has been technological.
Which makes Mr. Jobs’ speech today and Mr. Obama’s speech this evening equally important. (You can add to this a review of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s speech last Thursday on Internet freedom.)
(more…)