Over at The Arkansas Project, Cory Allen Cox has a thoughtful entry about why the Republican Party has struggled in the Natural State. He surmises that Republicans are terrible at cultivating the grassroots and building local support at the county level. That’s probably true, and I’m willing to take Mr. Cox’s word for it.
But in fairness to voters and to history doesn’t the Arkansas Republican face a crisis of candidate? Put another way, who in the world, honestly, wants to vote for any of the guys that have announced for major office? I know that sounds harsh, and it is. But it doesn’t mean that it’s inaccurate. Mike Huckabee, for all his flaws, was a likable fellow, and he trashed two Democratic Party opponents en route to victory. Win Rockefeller was, too; he also had the good fortune to run against Charlie Cole Chaffin.
While Mr. Huckabee’s proclamation that he was a man ne’er in need of a political party may have been politically appropriate, he was a man in desperate need of local support. He had it in the same way Bill Clinton and David Pryor and Dale Bumpers all had it. But he also had charisma and oratorical skills that out-shined his opponents.
Upon reading Mr. Cox’s piece, my first thought was that the Republican Party of 2009 is experiencing what the Democratic Party experienced in 1998, at least in part. In that year the Democrats fielded Bill Bristow for governor (he received 38% of the vote), Kurt Dilday for lieutenant governor (33% of the vote) and Judy Smith for U.S. Congress (42% of the vote). Granted, there are a few obvious distinctions: Blanche Lincoln easily won the race for U.S. Senate over Faye Boozman; Vic Snyder cruised to re-election over Phil Wyrick; and Mark Pryor beat Betty Dickey in the race for attorney general.
This year, the Arkansas Republican Party has offered up three phenomenally weak candidates for U.S. Senate (and in a year where Sen. Lincoln’s numbers appear to be the softest of her tenure): Blogger Curtis Coleman, hate-monger Kim Hendren and Conrad E. Reynolds (emphasis added). For Mr. Snyder’s seat the Republican’s have presented David Meeks whose notable attribute appears to his neck ties. And pizza man, ice cream-buyer and Glamour Shots beneficiary Mark Darr has announced that he’s running for Lt. governor against Bill Halter.
Furthermore, there has been no mention of any serious Republican interest in the races for governor, attorney general, secretary of state, state auditor or land commissioner. Democrats have announced candidates for each race. And Congressman John Boozman, a Republican, appears ripe to draw a primary challenger. Sure, Bernard Skotch more unlikeable than the PC Guy from the Apple commercials, but so what? Since his initial election Mr. Boozman has yet to face a primary opponent.
Like it or not, Mr. Cox, this is a clear sign of trouble in the Arkansas GOP.
Republicans can lament the current state of things, and they can even point to a failure to build life at the local level (to continue Mr. Cox’s flower metaphor) as the cause. Traditionally, that’s been the primary function of the state party – to party build. But has every political candidate and operative knows, the party can often do more harm than good.
County committees become dominated by “party people” who have been there for decades and who offer very little in terms of infrastructure, fundraising or organization. This has, on occassion, made it difficult to cultivate local talent and encourage people to engage in the process.
Please don’t misunderstand me: state political parties have value. But in order for them to be effective, even at the local level, they must have both vision and leadership.
Honestly, I couldn’t articulate the state GOP’s vision if you stuck a gun to my head (although I’ve argued that they should take a long look at some of the political rhetoric Rep. Dan Greenberg has been using at these TEA party rallies), but I’m fully comfortable stating that the leadership of the state GOP is terrible. All anyone knows of the current state GOP is that chairman Doyle Webb doesn’t believe Rep. Kathy Webb, a Democrat and of no relation, is competent to manage budget issues because of her sexual orientation. (This is why I have argued not only for Mr. Webb’s resignation, but for the GOP to hire the best state operative they have, David Kinkade of The Arkansas Project.) The broad ramifications of this suggest that the state party is so polarizing and out of touch that candidates and potential candidates would do well to avoid it. So much for party building.
What’s interesting is that a blueprint to solve the state GOP’s woes exists. Newt Gingrich’s Republican Revolution was prefaced by years of working to get good candidates to run for local offices. This, Mr. Gingrich argued, would provide them the necessary resume to springboard to higher office. Thus, he strategically recruited, funded and ran candidates for an array of offices – from county judge to alderman. And his plan worked. One need only look to the 1994 elections to see the fruits of this effort.
In short, this can and has been done.
But in order for that to happen, Republicans must cure a bigger problem: the lack of quality candidates. Mr. Cox worries that too many candidates are running for the same office. That’s not a problem. The problem exists when too few quality candidates find their name onto the ballot. Looking to 2010 that remains the most visible challenge facing Republicans.
Granted, it’s not entirely fair to suggest that Blogger Coleman or Mr. E. Reynolds are wholly illustrative of the GOP’s problems. After all, the Republican bench is fairly warm. State Reps. Jonathan Dismang and Allen Kerr, for example, have made positive news lately. Rep. Ann Clemmer, Rep. Davy Carter, Mr. Greenberg and Rep. Jon Woods, all Republicans, have all show moments of promise – at least to their constituent base. They also tweet, blog, and engage in meaningful dialogue with the press.
Maybe they’ll answer the call, and Mr. Cox can rest easy. In the meantime, state Republicans should read up on their political history. And while you’re at it, take a few moments to double check the next time a local school board seat opens up.
Blake,
I think you just said the exact same thing cory did…
Oh, and isn’t your wife-to-be a Republican? I know I’ve seen her mom at RPA HQ doing phone banks before.
Joe Michael P: Re-read Mr. Cox’s piece and I think you’ll see some noticeable distinctions, although we agree on the broader points. It wasn’t meant to be a critique of his positions or observations. But it is a response to what he wrote.
Your second comment is irrelevant to anything noted in the post. Stay on point or I’ll politely ask you to take your comments elsewhere.
Blake,
You and I agree. You are just more articulate than I am. An Arkansas Project reader with the handle of BR549 posted that the problem was the candidates Republicans run. I responded that it wasn’t the people running, it was that a vacuum exists which allows any Tom, Dick or Harry to step forward. That so many people can run for any office as a Republican indicates a lack of power to keep them from running. There is no pecking order, no Alpha Males or Females to keep upstarts from trying to run the pack. For all our lamenting of Gov. Beebe’s iron fist and ability to whip people in line, he is clearly the Alpha Male and keeps the nutjobs in the Democratic Party mostly silenced. Where is that in the Republican Party? I know, I know, a lot of people are going to say I’m elitist, that I’m ignoring the purpose of a primary, I’m limiting choices, yadda, yadda. I’d argue that I’m not elitist, I’m a realist. When there are multiple people running for one office with a supposed weak incumbent and other more challenging races leve the incumbent unopposed, one starts to wonder. To combine two cliché’s; are these cadidates reaching for the low hanging gold ring? Are they looking for the biggest reward with the least effort? That isn’t equal opportunity, that is opportunism.
This lack of lower level structure allows anyone with some money and self confidence to run. In theory, that’s a good thing, Mr. Smith goes to Washington and all. But when all your candidates are Mr. Smith, you start looking like amateur hour. I can find good with many of these candidates but that doesn’t mean they have the accumen to win nor the base to do it.
Many of these not ready for prime time candidates could run for local office and win, maybe get some experience and be more palatable for congress or statewide office later on . Many won’t be palatable later on, but in any event, they have a far greater chance of becoming a state legislator. Lord knows the Democrats elect their fair share of goobers to the legislature (don’t make me name names, you know how ridiculous it is that some of our legislators hold office). And God knows that all it takes to get elected county judge in some counties is a heartbeat and a “D” by your name.
In order for Republicans to win, they have to start local, show the voter base that just because granny was a Democrat, it don’t mean you have to be, and cultivate candidates, influence and power. Republicans may win in the next few cycles, but they will win for the wrong reason: people are going to vote against Obama. In order for Republican’s to win and have staying power they have to win because people identify with Republicans, not hate Obama. In order to do that, we have grow locally.
Yes, I may be whining a little, but after being active in the RPA since 1992, I’m growing a little sad to see this continual lack of local organization. It isn’t Doyle Webb’s fault, it isn’t Huckabee’s fault, or Asa’s, or Rockefeller. It isn’t any one person’s fault. Instead, it is the fault of every Republican in the organization. Someone needs to call us on it. I’m waiting for that person to show up.
[...] Lots of comments below with good discussion, and check out Blake Rutherford’s response over at Blake’s Think Tank, where the back and forth [...]
[...] and Rutherford took a stroll down the memory lane of Arkansas politics of yore, each trying to figure out just [...]
It is very soon to make the statement that all the Republican candidates who have stepped forward are “weak”. How do you know that? It must feel powerful to know all but we will see how that works out for you.
You have no idea how strong a candidates support is at this time so you might want to save yourself some embarrasment in the future. By the way, what is wrong with Col Reynolds name? The E stands for a long ancestral line of patriots who have fought for this country, given fortune,blood and lives for its freedom.Are you like many in this country today who think we would be just great without the military? History teaches hard lessons learned the hard way. So just to let you know,many,many who have known Col Reynolds for his entire life are proud to back and support him as the next Senator from Arkansas.